Clemson/ City of Charleston Focus on Wind Energy – Very Impressive

Last night, I was channel surfing and happened upon a weekly show called “Carolina Business Review” on PBS, which I watch from time to time. Last night, one of the three guests was the retiring President of Clemson University, James Barker who is an architect and professor of architecture by profession. During the discussion which included Ivan Urlaub, the Executive Director of the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association, Clemson’s efforts toward sustainable energy initiatives were highlighted as great examples for others to follow.

The Clemson Restoration institute, among other initiatives, has partnered with the City of Charleston, Santee Cooper, SC Department of Energy, Coastal Carolina University and US Department of Energy, to establish a Wind Turbine Testing Facility along the coast of South Carolina. This effort is backed by numerous wind energy companies who build turbines, such as General Electric, to test and improve upon the veracity of their turbines.

The goals of the Wind Turbine Testing Facility are to:

– improve the reliability and efficiency of the wind turbines;

– reduce capital cost and operating and maintenance costs;

– improve electric grid compatibility (this is key to success); and

– match generation with demand.

More on the mission and goals of the project can be found with the following link:

This effort was funded through a $98 million investment, which included a $45 million grant from the US Department of Energy. It is an ideal example of the historical public/ private partnership to fund major initiatives that will move us forward and has been a vital reason for our success as a country over time. And, this kind of investment creates jobs – 20,000 are predicted in the area. The Wind Energy industry already had 75,000 jobs in the US as of last fall, but that number is expected to grow to 500,000 if we take advantage of our wind power by 2030. Also, the industry anticipates 20% growth, which is definitely nothing to sneeze at.

For example, one of the statistics cited showed that 78% of the electricity used in the United States is within 28 coastal states. Our wind is in our plains and mountains, but there is an abundance of wind in our coastal regions, especially just offshore. This is where matching use with need comes to bear. And, unlike nuclear energy, oil derricks, and natural gas fracking sites, the worse thing that happens if a windmill crashes in the water is a splash. Please remember this, as any technology is only good as its worst operator.

Before closing, I also wanted to highlight a few other things that Clemson is doing within the Clemson Restoration Institute. They are focusing on energy initiatives such as: biodiesel, composting, electric vehicle charging, solar energy and sustainable building. President Barker is an impressive person. He has led Clemson to do some impressive things, especially around understanding the needs of businesses in the area and training his students to fulfill roles therein. I hope others are replicating his vision.

9 thoughts on “Clemson/ City of Charleston Focus on Wind Energy – Very Impressive

  1. thank you for always keeping me informed of wind energy progress here in the U.S. Even though I don’t get to read all your posts, the ones that I do catch are so informative!

  2. Go S.C.! I loved visiting Charleston this last spring, and found it to be more progressive than old coastal towns get credit for! Thanks for the update on a vital situation that requires us to look at energy gathering in new and dynamic ways.

    • Many thanks. We love Charleston as well and honeymooned in Kiawah nearby. Charleston – home of Spoleto, She-Crab Soup, and Stephen Colbert. By the way, guess who is the Business Development person for the Clemson Restoration Initiative – Elizabeth COLBERT Busch, the sister of Stephen. Take care, BTG

  3. I can’t understand why the US is so far behind Europe in harnessing wind & solar energy. (Well, unfortunately, I do understand…graft, petroleum…Ugh) I know that there are tradeoffs even with wind energy, (like migratory bird kill) but those impacts can’t possibly be as bad as the dangers of oil spills, pumping toxic chemicals into ground water supplies, and a host of other petroleum base problems. Thanks for keeping the issue alive.

    • Thanks. I agree we should be further along than we are, although we are further along than we give ourselves credit for. There are some who think these industries are still fledgling. On the migratory bird kill, I think that issue has been latched onto by the fossil fuel industry. I do not think it is as significant as portrayed, but nonetheless real. I appreciate your comments and thoughts, BTG

  4. Last weeks issue of Bloomberg BusinessWeek had a great article of how the big utilities must face the fact that their large infrastructure of power lines and grids are becoming archaic, in the onslaught of what they called micro-managed power grids. There was a heavy emphasis on the wind and solar industry and their impact on the future of power distribution. It was a great piece, and to me, just the harbinger of the future, with wind and solar becoming much bigger contributions.

    The fossil fuel industry can try to stand in the way all they like, but the enlightened CEO’s see the future, and are beginning to work towards being ready for it.

    Great piece, thanks for sharing the information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.