Obama’s Economy in 17 charts

In attempt to move beyond the rhetoric, attached is a series of charts with a brief commentary on each that I found on CNN Money, which does a good job of showing economic results under President Obama’s tutelage. These charts are updated through December, 2013. They do a nice job of taking some complex topics and boiling them down into 17 charts. It will not take too long to wade through them. I will let you draw you own conclusions.

http://money.cnn.com/gallery/news/economy/2014/01/28/obama-economy/index.html

I would love to hear your thoughts after you have perused these charts. What surprised you? What gives you concern? How do we address some key issues which may cause other measures to get worse before they get better?

**********************************************************

Some of my takeaways (comments added February 3, 2014)

On the positive side, while a president gets too much credit and blame for the economy, the steady job growth numbers over three and a half years is telling. The President and Congress passing the first stimulus bill (which did not fail per six econometric firms) as well as the bailout of the US automakers aided the recovery. The echo effect of not bailing out the automakers would have been significant. Also, the President has not gotten the credit he deserves on some community college retraining investment. What we needed was (and still do) an additional stimulus, but since the GOP opposition was using “failed stimulus” as campaign rhetoric, it precluded that as the legitimate course of action. Note a tax cut for the wealthy is not a jobs bill, as Trickle Down economics has been proven several times over not to work. We already have companies sitting on cash, so giving them more, won’t trickle down. If it would, the plan would have a better name.

The economy has also turned the corner. What is of interest is every governor running for office is touting a turned around economy in their state. The economic growth, corporate profits and stock performance (in part) charts show evidence of the improving economy. The stock performance is largely due to the Federal Reserve stimulus under Ben Bernanke. This money supply stimulus aided the economy. What Congress needs to realize is Bernanke felt a need to do something, since they were failing to do their job. Thank goodness he did.

On the concern front, I point to several measures which indicate the poverty problem in our country. The growth in food stamps, the stagnant wage and the unemployment number charts which mask the true rate of unemployment with so many not looking anymore, are indicative that our recovery is not being experienced by every one. Here is where I would add, while some fraud exists,  the data shows there is not significant misuse of the food stamp program. So, the increase is a good indicator of poverty rising in this country.

This is where we need combined efforts to address the problem. We need to push job retraining, minimum wage increases, and infrastructure investment. We should likely push out the extended unemployment benefits for a little longer, as we have a number of long term unemployed who will drop deeper into poverty. The infrastructure investment costs money which gets into the next topic, but is much-needed and is the  best jobs program out there.

The major concern is the increasing debt. This is one area where the Tea Party has it right, although they are myopic on the remedies. The deficit is coming down, but we need to get the annual budget back into a surplus position which is what President George W. Bush inherited. We need to look hard at the Simpson-Bowles Deficit Reduction Plan, which I fault the President and Congress for putting on a shelf, more so the President. We need both tax revenue increases as well as cuts.

While the Tea Party and GOP are touting tax cuts, that strategy is ill-founded, as we need more revenue as well to solve our problem. This is why Bush/ Dick Cheney fired Secretary of Treasury Paul O’Neill, as he openly disagreed with the Bush tax cuts. Here is where I like to add, any idiot can get elected talking about tax cuts, but we need to pay for some things, like infrastructure investment. And, truth be told, we have enough idiots in office.

Our country is falling apart and we must get deeper harbors on the east coast or the bigger ships passing through the bigger/ deeper Panama Canal will sail to Canadian ports. For example, LaGuardia airport, one of our nation’s busiest is the second worst airport structure in the country. Plus, per the Simpson-Bowles plan, we can cut more on defense rather than building vehicles and planes that fight older wars that are sitting unused on tarmacs. This is similar to China building huge cities that no one lives in.

So, if we really want to deal with the deficit and debt, we need to listen to folks like Simpson and Bowles. Cut defense even more along with some other cuts, reshape taxes to gain more revenue and invest in our infrastructure. As I mentioned in a post of a few weeks ago, borrowing to build or improve an asset is different from borrowing to pay for operational cost. Plus, the direct and indirect jobs around our infrastructure improvement projects will be felt in many places where needs exist.

That is my two cents. Some good comments are made below by readers. I would welcome others.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Obama’s Economy in 17 charts

  1. Two charts strike me as misleading; unemployment and manufacturing. The unemployment number is a construction by a government agency, using what I consider false and misleading “adjustments.” The Congress has just cut long term unemployment benefits, immediately cutting funds to 1.3+ million people. But this also reduced the unemployment number accordingly, since once benefits run out, you are no longer counted as unemployed.

    We need to accept that manufacturing jobs are leaving this country, and never coming back. Thank trade agreements like NAFTA and the proposed TPP for that. So showing an increase in manufacturing jobs is misleading at best.

    I agree that Obama’s presidency is not as bad as the Repubs would have us believe, but it is nowhere are good as he would have us believe, either.

    • Barney, good observations. I an going to save my full comments until after I see more from others. If you would permit me to alter your last sentence from “nowhere near” to “not as” I would agree with that statement. The charts show some positives, some concerns and some limitations as we move forward with things we need to do. Stay tuned. BTG

      • Going off message a bit, he would have us forget about his continuing drone strikes, after his promise of an open conversation. Same with spying, where he ignored two independent panels to continue his support, and his empty speech on “changes” he would make.

        IMHO, his biggest failure is bailing out Wall Street, while abandoning Main Street. He can talk till he’s blue in the face about the plight of the American People, but his words are as empty as John Boehner’s.

        There is a great piece today in Business Insider about the regulating failures towards big banks, and especially in the recent 74% pay increase for Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan. In Britian, bankers were fired. In the US, we gave them bonuses and raises.

        So maybe its only degrees, but nowhere near and not as are pretty close in my book.

        Thanks for the follow up comments. Great food for thought

      • No question, the drones and NSA issues require much more governance than he has offered thus far. On the bank side, we seem to be more content to collect fines than punish the overseers of malfeasance and poor risk taking.

  2. considering the huge mess that dubya left him, he’s done an amazing job! the poverty chart shocked me the most. I had no idea it was still that bad 😦

  3. Note to readers, thanks for your comments. I updated my post with my takeaways from the charts. Per Barney’s comments, these focus on the economy, jobs, poverty, infrastructure, etc. There are some other concerns he raised regarding our President, which are legitimate ones.

    • while I agree there are things to be concerned about, I take into consideration how difficult it must be to have that job. I know I could never do it! and maybe I just want to have a rose colored glasses approach, I dunno. but I still say he’s far superior than anyone the other parties have “trotted out”. can you imagine where we’d be had Romney become president? I shudder to think! I even go as far back as Jimmy who I think was a visionary. I do believe we would not have this climate crisis had he not been demonized and could have stayed president for 4 more years. Or even if the election was not stolen from Al Gore….no “terrorist” attacks on 9/11, no war in Iraq and we’d have continued down the road of progress that Clinton left. and he wasn’t perfect either but I think that history will show that both Clinton and Obama have done more for our country than any of the boobs before and after……

      • Toby, you provide some great context for the discussion. Carter suffered from a bad economy and was always viewed as an outsider, but two things interest me looking backwards. When you look at jobs created under presidencies, Carter stands taller than many. And, many look back at his energy plan and said he had the right idea. Reagan actually took down solar panels from the White House that Carter put up there. What is also of interest to me is both Clinton and Reagan were similar in one area – expanding trade with other countries. Clinton was the best job creating president per numbers (FDR had a better rate of jobs growth) and Reagan actually did pretty well for job creation, especially for a Republican president. What many would disbelieve, when you look at history, there have been 2 1/2 times the jobs created under Democratic presidencies than under GOP presidencies. But, everyone believes the converse is true. Thanks for your thoughts. BTG

      • I know, it boggles the mind how so many people don’t do their own research and just believe anything they’re told. Carter is a good case in point. One of, if not THE smartest presidents we’ve ever had and he’s looked at badly. such a shame.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s