A few why questions – sample letter

The following is a draft letter I forwarded to my newspaper. It is short and sweet given their word limitations. I hope they will print it. Please feel free to adapt and use if you like the concept:

I am troubled by a few why questions:

– why did White House staff try to hide the president’s so called perfect call?
– why would Ukraine leaders meet with Lev Parnas if he did not have the “juice?”
– why would real diplomats be kept in the dark by the Giuilani/Trump shadow diplomacy?
– why did Rep. Devin Nunes not recuse himself if his name appeared in the Parnas documents?
– why do 63% of Europeans feel the US president is untrustworthy (per a recent Pew survey)?

Please feel free to share any success or sample letters that you have gotten printed or sent to Senators and Congressional representatives.

11 thoughts on “A few why questions – sample letter

    • Brendan, there is a huge obfuscation effort going on by Trump sycophants. This is a why question that these folks don’t want answered. There is one thing certain, like Nixon, when Trump said he did nothing wrong, he is wrong. Keith

  1. The newspaper will reply or not as befits its editorial stance. The followers of Trump will have their answers or diversions ready in various forms. The fight will now be for those who did not vote last time around. Hopefully letters such as yours Keith will stir them into seeing an end to this unhappy period in American history and stop further degeneration.

    • Roger, we need more stirrers. Could you tell folks to ask these questions of as many Americans as you can. Maybe inquistive and caring outsiders can stir pots that need stirring. Keith

  2. Note to Readers: Two comments. I posted this on about thirty Senators’ websites. Please feel free. The other is this article from The Washington Post, which paints clearly the question at hand. Do GOP Senators want to know now or later about the alleged Trump corruption. Take it to the bank – more will come out, both future transgressions or ones already committed.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinions-schiff-asked-gop-senators-a-tough-question-the-answer-is-awful/ar-BBZfVTe?ocid=spartandhp

  3. Note to Readers II:The following is a revised version of the above post, which I am using to send to some folks in an email. I dropped the Nunes part and added the GAO and Trump denial of knowing Parnas issues. Please feel free to use variations of either one.

    This independent and former GOP voter is troubled by a few why questions:

    – why did White House staff try to hide the president’s so called perfect call?
    – why would Ukraine leaders meet with Lev Parnas if he did not have the “juice?”
    – why was Trump not forthcoming about knowing Parnas?
    – why would real diplomats be kept in the dark by the Giuilani/Trump shadow diplomacy?
    – why did the nonpartisan GAO determine withholding the aid to Ukraine was illegal?
    – why do 63% of Europeans feel the US president is untrustworthy (per a recent Pew survey)?
    – why would any logical person take the president at his word, when five biographers said he has a problem with the truth?

    To my way of thinking, we need to dig further and call witnesses who can speak more clearly about the president’s apparent corrupt behavior.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.