Please indulge me a few questions. It won’t take too long.
If you worked with someone who repeatedly was in verbal, text, email and twitter fights with other people, what would be your observation?
If the other people who had dust ups with this person included customers, colleagues, third parties, and the media, what would you conclude?
If you spoke with previous employers and found the same was true at their locations, what might you ascertain?
If you investigated further and found out the stories keep changing when new information is revealed, does that paint a better picture of the person?
If the person was found to be less than truthful on many more than a few occasions, would that help you understand the situation? What if it was apparent the lying was more routine?
If the person repeatedly failed to admit when he wronged someone and it was never his fault, does that convince you of something?
The key conclusion is there seems to be a lone constant in these equations. It would appear the person is of little character and is hard to get along with.
If you were his colleague, you would choose to limit contact with this person and you would document everything for verification. An email saying “this is what you agreed to” would help in that regard.
If you were a customer, you would request a new contact or change providers of service.
If you were a third party, a senior person at your firm might call a senior person at his firm to register concerns.
If you were the media, you would get information from a better, more reliable source.
If you were his boss, you would have long ago put him on an improvement plan, perhaps several. At some point, you would ask him to leave or get him to leave. My guess is his ego would be bruised by the first improvement plan and he would leave. He would tell his new employer that his previous one did not appreciate him enough.
The person who I am obviously talking about is in the position of the President of the United States. He is being investigated for collusion with the Russians, which may lead to his demise. More than a few psychiatrists think he may be unfit for office. In the interim, we are stuck with his actions noted above. Maybe the first step is a censure, which would be Congress’ performance improvement plan.
A survey reports that 42% of Americans want this man impeached and 15% want him censured. That is an absolutely amazing statement that 57% feel he is worthy of some formal repudiation, with almost half saying he should be removed.