No authorization

My friend, who is a retired financial executive, forwarded the following email and New York Times piece. His introduction and the article need no further explanation.

“Not only has Congress not authorized such a war, but it has barely even debated it. The administration has not bothered to explain, either to Congress or the American people, why it might bomb Iran or what it hopes to achieve. ‘There haven’t been any briefings about a military strategy,’ said the Democratic representative Ro Khanna, who is working with his Republican colleague Thomas Massie to force a vote on an antiwar measure.”

Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

I never imagined I’d miss being lied to by George W. Bush and his henchmen.

When the Bush administration wanted to go to war with Iraq, it undertook a full-court press to propagandize the American people. Administration officials leaked false information about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, which turned out not to exist. Secretary of State Colin Powell gave a deceptive presentation at the United Nations. In Congress, many Democrats, succumbing either to relentless public pressure or their own hawkish instincts, joined with Republicans to authorize an invasion.

This mendacious campaign was shameful and despicable, and helped create today’s national atmosphere of corrosive cynicism and nihilistic paranoia. But it was, in retrospect, a tacit acknowledgment that public opinion mattered, that a president couldn’t start a war without convincing Americans it was necessary. It was a manipulation of democratic deliberation rather than a negation of it.

Compare that episode with Donald Trump’s threatened war with Iran. On Wednesday, Axios’s well-sourced reporter Barak Ravid warned, “The Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize. It could begin very soon.” America has undertaken the largest air power buildup in the region since the Iraq war. Outlets including The New York Times have reported that the military has given Trump the option to strike as soon as this weekend.

Not only has Congress not authorized such a war, but it has barely even debated it. The administration has not bothered to explain, either to Congress or the American people, why it might bomb Iran or what it hopes to achieve. “There haven’t been any briefings about a military strategy,” said the Democratic representative Ro Khanna, who is working with his Republican colleague Thomas Massie to force a vote on an antiwar measure.

Most reporting indicates that the White House is planning for a campaign far more intense and sustained than last year’s bombing of Iran or the abduction of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro. But we don’t know if Trump and his team are after regime change, and if they are, what they think comes next. This is how an autocracy goes to war, without even a pretense that the consent of the governed matters.

13 thoughts on “No authorization

    • Nan, he is the proverbial bully. The only way to stop a bully is to stand up to him. As you said, otherwise he will do what he wants, including breaking the law. Keith

      • And we have to remember that this is a human being about as stable as melting Jello. He’s a bully, and the most dangerous kind, because he doesn’t pick and choose, he goes after anything that catches his attention.

      • Judy, based on his track record, like a bully, he has be made to follow the law as he is prone to bend, break and not comply with legal directions. He has not honored his own settlement agreements. That is what a truant he is. Keith

  1. Any U.S. strike on Iran would likely trigger:

    • Missile attacks on U.S. bases
    • Hezbollah attacks on Israel
    • Disruption of Gulf shipping
    • Cyber warfare
    • Possible closure of Hormuz

    The primary motives that might be cited for such an attack are:

    1. Nuclear deterrence
    2. Regional power balance
    3. Protection of allies
    4. Maintaining global energy flow

    The least likely primary motives are:

    • Seizing oil
    • Pure financial gain
    • Simple ideological conquest

    From a risk vs. benefit standpoint, a full regime-change war with Iran would be viewed by most defense planners as:

    ➡️ High cost
    ➡️ High uncertainty
    ➡️ Low controllability

    Which is why it has been avoided by multiple administrations despite decades of tension. US efforts at effecting regime change have a history of not being effective and in fact producing opposite effects. Mohammad Mosaddegh was one of many such examples.

    Perhaps Trump is hoping for the Iranians to overthrow the regime and we just provide military support but that seems rather capricious.

    • John, thanks for your concise summary with its caution. I have little confidence in Messers. Trump and Hegseth and the fact he does not seek permission should concern every American. Keith

      • The man is a wild card who is unpredictable and that is made worse because he is stupid as well. Nevertheless, for the most part, I think he is a puppet being managed by more clandestine power brokers who use him to exhort advantages for themselves or their clients. Every so often President Dumbbell goes off script. He might just blow up the world one of these days. IMHO

      • John, too many thought they could temper and control this wild card. Just look at the number of former associates who have ruined their career or followers who went to jail supporting this wild card. Rudy Giuliani is just one example. As former Republican strategist Rick Wilson said, Trump destroys everything he touches. Keith

  2. Note to Readers: As an old fart, I have observed when politicians do NOT follow procedures, take it to the bank, it is political. Thanks to Senator Mitch McConnell, we did not interview an excellent SCOTUS nominee as he made up his own rule about not interviewing a nominee in an election year, and ended up the following year with a lesser quality SCOTUS associate justice. It is not like his Senate was too busy to meet with him.

    So, Donald Trump’s not following procedures is not unusual nor is it NOT apolitical. What the Republicans in Congress who are scared of Trump have failed to realize, adhering to rules and processes is a way to govern and temper the incumbent president. Sadly, the Speaker of the House is one of the biggest Trump toadies around.

    Going back to McConnell, he had a chance to save America from Trump and he failed us. In his second impeachment trial in the Senate, the vote to convict Trump was 57 to 43, including seven Republicans. If McConnell had pushed for it, he could have gotten the needed ten more votes. He could have told MAGA fans, my hands are tied, Trump is guilty of seditious actions against our country.

  3. My favorite of all was the ‘hunt for wmds” and the nightly news that reported sadly none had been found, for days, possibly weeks. We were shown images of serious looking people staring seriously at maps as if it were granny on her death bed. And then. One night it was announced that they had found, by golly, a WMD, and were about to discover what it was. They brushed the sand away. The camera dollied in. ‘Made in USA”.

    oops.

    • Judy, we should never forget Scooter Libby who worked for Karl Rove and Dick Cheney. Libby went to jail for outing CIA agent Valerie Plame in the news to punish her husband, former ambassador Dick Wilson, who discredited the White House for lying about what he found as WMDs. Wilson wrote a New York Times piece that said he found nothing of the sort. Keith

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.