Let’s focus on the bigger stories

The former president is in court facing charges that he misused campaign funds to pay off a woman he had an affair with along with a tabloid to kill a story on a more lengthy affair with yet another woman. He denies both, but he paid them off to keep quiet. Plus, election interference is thrown in as well.

Yet, too much press coverage and entertainment news is around the fact he fell asleep in court. Really? He is an elderly person who likely gets tired sitting as others drone on. I get tired as well and he has me by a few years.

But, that is not the story. Financial fraud and lying about it is the story. This happens all too often with press coverage on the former president. The focus is on pedestrian issues which deviate from the main focus of his actual and alleged crimes.

One of the best examples of a financial fraud by the former president gets largely overlooked. The former president settled a court case to pay back donated money to his Foundation that he used for personal purposes. The Foundation was then terminated and monies distributed to charities in keeping with the by-laws of the Foundation. Further, no one named Trump could oversee this process and all trustees named Trump had to undergo philanthropic training. By the way, Trump’s CFO was listed as a Boardmember, but they forgot to tell him he was.

This last story is a small one, but is a microcosm of the fraudulent behavior of the former president. When his fans say he did nothing wrong, that is simply not true over and over again. Whether it is running his mouth after a defamation verdict leading to an increased penalty from $5 million to $83 million or taking donated money from a Foundation or strong arming in a recorded call a Georgia election official to change vote counts, eg there is evidence he has done wrong.

Falling asleep is just a humorous highlight. It is not the story. The story is the former president is an adjudicated fraud in three recent cases and is liable in two defamation cases and is accused of much more.

Trump – the black cloud that won’t go away even in Arizona

In a Politico article by Betsy Woodruff Swan and Kyle Cheney called “Arizona Grand Jury has indicted Trump Allies for 2020 Election Interference” the bad news for people who did the former president’s bidding continues. It is akin to a black cloud that just won’t go away. Here are the first two paragraphs:

“An Arizona grand jury has indicted 18 allies of Donald Trump for their efforts to subvert the 2020 election — including former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Boris Epshteyn.

The indictment, which includes felony counts of conspiracy, fraud and forgery, also describes Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator.”

An unindicted co-conspirator? The chef stirring the pot is unindicted? Of course, his fans and sycophants will say, see he did nothing wrong. Yet, election interference would not occur nor would the January 6 insurrection which has over 300 settlements and convictions, if an accountable and responsible person was in the White House. Trump would not be accused of exhibiting either trait.

As for those plus 300 and other folks in Arizona, Michigan and Georgia, Trump’s black cloud still lingers over them. I am glad to see his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows is included along with Rudy Giuliani as both have bastardized their reputations by cheating, lying and intimidating for the former president. Giuliani has already suffered greatly, but here comes some more rain from the black cloud.

I have no idea why a rational person would consider voting for Donald Trump. I find it embarrassing. If he lies and cheats about the election dividing our country, how hard is it to believe he us untruthful about many more things? Joe BIden is not perfect, but there is clear distinction between him and his illicit acting opponent.

My message to Republican incumbents and candidates is simple. As an independent and former member of both parties, mostly Republican, I will NOT vote for any candidate that supports Donald Trump for president. Full stop. I have this thing about our president should not be a traitor and adjudicated as a fraud and defamer.

Birth Control Message – a repeat from The Boss

The following is an encore performance for a post written years ago and repeated once before.

I think I have cited Bruce Springsteen (The Boss) on a couple of occasions, but I want to lift some lyrics from one of my favorite songs of his “The River” which is pertinent to my point of readily available birth control and education. This song is about a man remembering nostalgically how he used to go “down to the river” with his girlfriend and how life was much simpler before she got pregnant with his child.

The lyrics I want to quote are as follows:

“Then, I got Mary pregnant and man, that was all she wrote.

And, for my nineteenth birthday I got a union card and a wedding coat.

We went down to the courthouse and the judge put it all to rest.

No wedding day smiles, no walk down the aisle.

No flowers, no wedding dress.”

In my post “If Churches Really Want to Make a Difference” a few weeks ago, I suggest that the church should be more involved with legitimate sex education with their young teenagers, including the use of contraception. Kids don’t know enough about this subject and it is the thing they talk most about. The peer pressure is intense. It is more than OK to discuss abstinence, but if you remember your teenage years, that is not going to happen very often. I won’t repeat all of the points made therein, but informed teens should be aware of the need for protected sex as well as ways to say no, if they feel pressured (if a girl) and ways to treat a girl who is saying no (if a boy).

The LA Times reported just this week that data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed the birthrate among American teens between 15 and 19, while decreased since 1991 is still at 34.3 births per 1,000 women. That rate is 5 times the teen birthrate in France and 2 1/2 times the teen birthrate in Canada. It is also higher than the rates in China and Russia. The CDC reports that 80% of teen pregnancies are unintended meaning after unprotected sex or under protected sex. We have a higher incidence of sexual assault among teens as well.

Using Springsteen’s song, Mary did not need to end up pregnant. With birth control access and better sex education, Mary and the boy could have been more adroit at handling the issue before the heat of the moment caused a fait accompli. The rest of the song talks about how Mary and the boy go through the motions of life after being forced to do the right thing and marry. Their dreams were stifled. Yet, if she could say no, or have protected intercourse, then their lives need not be over.

My main point is so many issues could be better addressed through a better protected and more informed group of teenagers. There is high correlation to poverty and family size, especially if the family starts early. There is a high percentage of single parents in teen mothers, so in more cases than not, Mary’s beau would have left the building. With fewer unwanted pregnancies, then there would be fewer abortions. And, our teens would have a chance to grow up more before they start having babies. Finally, per Dr, Cora Breuner of Seattle Children’s Hospital, babies born to teens tend to fare more poorly than babies delivered to older age group parents.

I also believe the education part is just as vital. If the young girls and boys hear from respected sources about these very important life issues, they will be better positioned to handle them. More and more kids are not seeing churches in the same light as their parents. Some churches are actually driving people away with their evangelicalism. I firmly believe if you provide more venues to talk in an intelligent way with the teens about their problems, they will attend and listen. They don’t need to be preached to on the subject, but abstinence is an acceptable discussion point. I think it is important to note that you do not have to have sex if you are being pressured into doing so.

Per Dr. Breuner as reported by the LA Times, “We really can do better. By providing more education and improving access to contraception and more education about family planning, we can do better.” Note, Breuner helped write the new policy statement as a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Adolescence.

Springsteen, as usual, vividly depicts a real world problem. I think his song could be played during the sex education classes. These kids loved each other (or at least thought they did), gave into passion and after unprotected sex, their dreams were over. This is reality. Why should we not finds ways to educate and help before the “point of reckoning” rather than to let the kids figure it out after it is too late. In today’s time, it can be even worse when a STD enters the equation.

Thanks Bruce for your terrific song. “The River” can permit the dream to continue with protected sex. And, for parents and church leaders who want to throw the bible at me, let me quote a truism that I said in my previous post. Teenagers are going to have sex. If you do not believe me, there is an evangelical university within a three-hour drive of where I live. These young church raised kids “go crazy” when they get away from mom and dad. I actually cleaned that up a little from the quote from someone who attended there. So, we should help them on their journey by giving them the tools and education they need.

Tuesday afternoon – let me ponder

Using the title of an excellent Moody Blues’ song, allow me to do a walkabout with some meandering thoughts on this chilly, but sunny April day.

Earth Day has come and gone, but its message should never leave us – there is no Planet B. So, we better take care of the one we got. We cannot use our planet as our trash bin without having an impact. Plastic resides in too many fish and the forever chemical in Teflon resides in too many humans.

Former President Richard Nixon is remembered for Watergate and resigning before he was removed from office, but one good thing he did was set up the Environmental Protection Agency. This entity was set up not too long after the river flowing through Cleveland caught fire from all of the chemical residue.

I read some well-funded politicians are pushing for the reversal of many environmental regulations. This is inane as it moves us in the wrong direction. Maybe we should all watch the movies “Erin Brockovich,” “Dark Waters,” and “A Civil Action” again to see what happens when corporations lie to people about their toxic waste. The sad part is when heroes make these companies accountable for their long-known poisoning of people, it is so rare they make movies about them.

Circling back to the Teflon residue, in “Dark Waters” it noted DuPont was proven to be responsible for poisoning workers and towns people by the largest study of people ever. They then reneged on their promise to compensate their victims and were taken to court one case at a time losing all of them before settling the rest.

There is a tenet called “The Precautionary Principle” that the US does not mandate. This principle requires a company to prove no harm beforehand rather thirty years after poisoning people. Now, these politicians want to make the US even further behind by reversing strides.

This is inane. There is no Planet B.

Increased family size is highly correlated with poverty (redux)

I wrote this about seven years ago and posted it again last year. It is still an important message.

We have a global poverty problem, but what may surprise some, the US has not escaped the problem. Our middle class has been squeezed, but unfortunately, gravity has caused too many of them to fall beneath or just above the poverty line.

There are many reasons for the decline, but it has been occurring over the last 50 years, so all politicians own this issue. Technology advances, globalization, stagnant wages, downsizing of union populations, costly healthcare, etc. are all contributing factors.

Yet, it should be noted that large family size and one parent families are highly correlated with increased poverty. These two factors should not be a revelation, but too many folks look past these causes to others. This a key reason for the importance of family planning to help families manage their family size and health.

Today, I saw a report that noted the US has more teen pregnancies than other western nations. A data point was cited (without a source) that 30% of teens in the 9th grade have sexual relationships increasing to 60% in the 12th grade. The report supported the practice of more holistic sex education in schools, an experiment being promoted in West Virginia, where 1 out of eight births are to teen mother.

The training speaks to more than abstinence and contraception. It speaks to how to say no and not give in to pressure. It discusses sexual assault and STDs. It speaks to relationships and the role sex plays when folks are ready.

Family planning and sex education are key tools in fighting poverty. There is a causal relationship between family planning and fewer abortions, which should give those against family planning some consolation. There is a causal relationship between family planning and lower health care costs. Rather than condemn or not fund these efforts, we should look at the data and support them.

Correct nomenclature

We need to make sure we use the correct nomenclature. I often see the word “conservative” applied to those who are most conservative. All Republicans are conservative. The folks holding the party hostage are “extreme conservatives.”

The Freedom Caucus, where many of these extreme conservatives call home, has long cared more about upsetting apple carts than using them to deliver apples. They are zealous ideologues who just want to shout at the wind, to mix metaphors.

Speaker Mike Johnson working with Democrats to get key legislation passed is not new. Republican Speaker John Boehner did the same on big issues. It got him in trouble with the ideologues, but it got needed stuff passed. The harping by the Freedom Caucus finally forced him to retire.

Note, Democrats have their own set of more zealous ideologues, but I don’t see them holding up needed change as the more organized Freedom Caucus more often does. But, the Democrat ideologues get too caught up on social media popular concerns rather than those which affect more people. To me, it becomes a distraction.

To me, gerrymandering has allowed more ideaologues to get elected in primaries where they later do not stand any tangible opposition in the November vote. A key change needed to improve governance is to have nonpartisan redistricting. It would be nice to have elected officials we could respect more rather than those shouting at the wind. And, we all know their names.

One more long sentence for January 6 insurrection

In an article by Michael Kunzelman of AP News called “Proud Boys group leader sentenced to over 5 years in prison for attacking police during Capitol riot,” another long sentence of a serious offender has been ruled upon. Here is the gist:

“WASHINGTON (AP) — A far-right extremist group leader was sentenced on Friday to more than five years in prison for repeatedly assaulting police officers with makeshift weapons during a mob’s attack on the U.S. Capitol over three years ago.

Scott Miller, who helped lead a Proud Boys chapter for Maryland and Washington, D.C., coordinated with other group members before they invaded the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, according to federal prosecutors. Miller, 33, attacked police seven different times with weapons, including a bottle, a stick and poles.

Notes found on Miller’s cellphone indicate that his white supremacist ideology and antisemitic views influenced his decision to storm the Capitol, a prosecutor wrote in a court filing. He expressed his intent to ‘fight’ in order to protect ‘White America,’ the filing says.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing former President Donald Trump’s election interference case in Washington, said an attack like the Jan. 6 insurrection ‘can happen again’ in the U.S.”

I can hear the retorts already about the person who instigated and greased the skids of all of this. He did nothing wrong. It is political. You just don’t like him. The answers to these three oft asked questions are: Yes, he did. It is not political to punish people for rebelling against the peaceful transfer of power because their figurehead is not man enough to say he lost and has failed miserably trying to prove he did not. No, I do not like people who openly lie, bully, divide, defraud, sexually assault and betray their country. Call me crazy.

I was not mistaken, I was misquoted (a revisit)

I initially wrote this post twelve years ago. While a certain presidential candidate is highly prolific with lying dating well before his one term as president, he is not the first politician or person to be caught in a lie.

On our way to school this morning, my son and daughter were arguing over who said what. My son told his sister that she is acting like a politician and uttered, “I am not mistaken, I was misquoted.” I almost ran off the road it was so funny. It reminds me that you cannot hide from your comments in this day and age. They may be taken out of context, but they have been recorded somewhere, so you cannot disown them.

Last year, Charles Barkley, the former basketball player and current sports analyst, got some flack for what appeared in his book. His classic response was he was “misquoted.” To which the reporter replied, “But Charles, it is your autobiography.” Of course, we learned that Charles did not write his autobiography, but he least could have read it first.

Doonesbury is one of my favorite comic strips. In my paper, it sits right above Dilbert another favorite, which is a neat two for one reading. For about a week, Doonesbury was lampooning presidential candidate Mitt Romney for his inability to remember the hazing incident in high school. As the story goes, Romney and other students were offended by an effeminate look on another high school boy. So, they took it upon themselves to hold him down while they cut his locks. To this day, Romney’s co-conspirators are mortified and shamed by their past actions. One actually saw their victim a few years ago and apologized profusely. It goes without saying the victim remembers the incident.

Which leads us to Romney, who cannot recall the incidence and referred to it as high school hijinks. I have written in an earlier post the failure to remember is as bad as the incident, since he is now an adult. At age 53, I can remember all the dumb ass things I did in my life and I feel remorse if I offended someone. Since I try to do the right thing, I cannot always remember those, as they far outweigh my misdeeds. But, I can make a list of infamy very quickly and tell you how bad I feel even today.

Doonesbury had an appropriate field day with Romney’s lack of memory on this. My favorite remark was when Romney was lampooned for not being able to remember a “hate crime.” I would have felt much better about Romney if he owned up to his mistake and said this was an occasion where I screwed up in my youth and I feel horrible about it. It would have been even better, if he had reached out to the individual. And, I don’t want to let him off the hook for his hijinks either. While I did dumb things in my youth, I was never part of group that physically tormented one person.

While we are on Doonesbury, I was reminded the other night about their most famous lampooning that of George H.W. Bush, which went on for the rest of his political career and was even applied to his son. I was watching the HBO documentary “Reagan” which is quite even-handed and, as a result, quite good. The first act of George’s that started us down the path of misquoting is he is caught on video referring to Reagan’s economic plan as “Voodoo Economics” when he was running against Reagan for the GOP nomination. After becoming his Vice President, he was later asked about these comments. He said on video that he never said that. The documentary shows the footage of him doing so. As a sidebar, he was correct as Reaganomics did not work except for the wealthy.

If that were not enough, later during Reagan’s worst episode, the Iran-Contra affair where Reagan actually did something illegal and could have been impeached, Bush said he was not in certain meetings and did not have anything to do with the affair. The testimony and meeting notes showed that he was. Note, Reagan and Bush survived because Oliver North fell on the sword for his commanders and took the heat. So, Doonesbury started portraying Bush as a disembodied helmet. When he spoke, the words were evoked from underneath the helmet. To this day, if the senior Bush is included in the comic strip, he is referenced in this manner.

One of my favorites, though, are the immortal words of Senator John Kyl when he was caught in an erroneous comment about Planned Parenthood last spring (I believe it was last year). When his incorrect comments were pointed out to him, he said something close to don’t misinterpret what I say as a factual statement. I had to re-read this line three times because he is in essence is saying I am lying.

I know I have hit on several Republicans. I don’t dislike Reagan or the first Bush and I thought they did some good things during their presidencies. I also think Bill Clinton did some great things while he was President, but he uttered one of the most famous statements and then nitpicked it later when it was proven to be false. Bill Clinton will be remembered for two things. He was an effective President. And, he was a philanderer. So, when he stared into the camera and said slowly and emphatically “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” he was lying. When caught in the lie he spent a lot of time nitpicking over the word “is.” To do this day, I still don’t know what he was talking about, but he did have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky in every one else’s book.

Reagan also lied to the American people about the Iran-Contra affair. But, he did come back later and say he was wrong. That won him some Brownie points at least. Clinton never did a full mea culpa at least not to my satisfaction.

Let me close with the recent story about the tragedies going on in Syria. The ambassador for Syria was telling a reporter that the government did not have troops in Homs where a massacre was occurring. The reporter listened and said “But your tanks are rolling in Homs” while the footage was being played on the news. What Assad does not realize fully is we can see and hear what is going on. This is not like when his father did the same thing thirty years ago.

We are a world of imperfect people. We do and say dumb things. I am not saying that everyone should tell everyone their dirty laundry, but when it gets out in the open, take your medicine and say “yes, I screwed up.” I am big on context as you may have gleaned from earlier posts. When someone is quoted out of context, they should say “yes, I said that, but here is the context of why I said that.” It is like Newt Gingrich saying he was misquoted when he appeared with Nancy Pelosi on the global warming commercial noting he was wrong about denying global warming. When running for President, he said he really did not mean it when he denounced what he earlier believed. In other words, he double downed on denouncing. So, like double negatives, two denounces make a positive.

So, politicians and leaders, let’s practice our new statements for future use. You will need them.

– “I was wrong and feel terrible about it.”

– “I did say that and hear is why I said that.”

– “I screwed up. I will fix what I have done and will try to do better.”

– “I used to believe that way, but after doing more research and with the benefit of experience, I have changed my position.”

I will like you more if you do. I am sure others will as well.

A review of “Enough” by an attorney acquaintance

The following is a group email I received from a retired, defense attorney in North Carolina who is well-thought of by more than a few folks. I will leave off his name.

”Good morning! Since Keith has referenced this book (“Enough” inserted) several times, I thought I would weigh in. I too have read it and here’s my take. I think Cassidy comes across as young and naive. She seemed to lack self awareness as she was being used by Trump, Meadows and McCarthy. She had information and access as a result of being an attractive female who was personable with some organizational skills. These qualities allowed her to be a part of Trump World. She might still be a part of it but for Trump reneging on his offer to take her to Mar-A-Largo with him. She was late to enlightenment, but fortunately eventually got there.

The real hero of the book is Liz Chaney. She was the calm, cool role model Cassidy so desperately needed. Her strength to put the Country ahead of her career was what allowed Cassidy to develop the courage to break free of Trump World and to tell the truth.

The other heroes were the Alston & Bird lawyers who represented her PRO BONO and helped her navigate her legal and political perils. The lessons here about Trump were already abundantly clear, but it is still unsettling to read from a first hand account just how selfish, petty, volatile and unstable he really is. Meadows comes across as a cowardly sycophant.

Trump World is like the Mafia: Be loyal to The Boss and be taken care of. We already knew all this but somehow it still has shock value. I think after all Trump has said and done, the fact that he still has fervent supporters willing to return him to the highest elected office in our Country, is a permanent stain on our collective character and integrity and standing in the world. Please feel free to agree, disagree, share or ignore this take. Best to all.”

I think it is a good review of “Enough” and a proper assessment of all involved. I do feel Hutchinson, with the help of those mentioned, found courage to testify and that is heroic in its own right. My response to this email is provided below. If you have not read the book, it is worth the read.

Note: The email was written in one paragraph, so I inserted paragraph breaks for ease of reading.

*******
Response to email: “… this is a good summary. What Trump fails to realize is he slowly drives people away when they have had ‘enough.’ I agree about the Alston & Bird attorneys who also protected her from the usual death threats. Liz Cheney is a hero to make Hutchinson feel comfortable in telling the truth. I also agree with your comment about Mark Meadows.

These folks should get more credibility for telling the truth in the face of death threats. I get tickled that Trump said he will testify and ‘tell the truth.’ One attorney said he once deposed Trump under oath and got him to recant 30 assertions to avoid perjuring himself.

Thanks for your summary.”

Throw me some real shade

In an article in The Guardian by Nina Lakhani called “‘We need more shade’: US’s hottest city turns to trees to cool those most in need,” Phoenix’ problems are beginning to be addressed. The sub-headline adds more flavor. “Phoenix broke several heat records last year. Now Grant Park, which has inequitable tree cover, is seeing a tree-planting drive that promises some respite from 100F temperatures.”

Here are a few select paragraphs. “…Over the course of three days in early April, arborists planted 40 or so desert adapted trees in Grant Park, as part of the city’s equity-driven heat mitigation plan to create a shadier, more livable environment amid rising temperatures and hundreds of heat-related deaths….

Phoenix is America’s fifth largest and hottest city, a sprawling urban heat island which has expanded without adequate consideration to climate and environmental factors like water scarcity and extreme heat. ​Multiple heat records were broken last year including 133 days over 100F (37.7C), and 55 days topping 110F (43C).

‘Our goal is to change the inequity and create enough shade to provide residents and passersby reprieve from the heat. For that we need many more trees, but we also need to take care of them,’ added Ontiveros, as he walked through the neighborhood making sure the right families got the right trees.”

Planting trees is a part of a needed solution to both specific heat and larger climate change mitigation. We need more carbon eaters for the latter goal and more new trees, mangroves, and larger forests will help. For the local goal, shade trees will offer both respite, scenery, and a little cooling.

It has long been predicted the climate change impact would be varied as it hits different areas. The more arid and hotter areas will see more droughts and heat. With the mountain top ice moving further up the slopes, the drier underbrush are prone to more forest fires. And, the coastal areas are losing shoreline and increasing the intensity and clout of hurricanes.

We need to use a variety of large scale efforts to put less carbon in the air and take more carbon out of the air. Tree planting is just one of those efforts. But, far more is needed.