Letter from an Italian blogging friend

The following is a message from an Italian blogging friend who goes by Eterea. Her message is well crafted and stands on its own.

************

“Dear Mr. Trump,
I find it difficult to call you “President.” I don’t usually talk about politics because it’s not my area; the real problem, Mr. Trump, is that you believe you hold the keys to the world. This is clear from your authoritarian and overbearing actions.
The excuse of wanting to restore America to superpower status no longer holds up in the face of the many decisions made solely for your own thirst for power. The American people are lovely and welcoming, peaceful and tolerant; I believe your theatrics do not do justice to the wonderful people you represent.
Forgive my outburst, Mr. Trump, but the world and peace deserve respect and sobriety.
Long live America, long live democracy!”

********

I agree with her assessment. I believe America has earned the right to be called a rogue nation. To be frank, I do not like being such and am embarrassed by what we have become.*

*Note: Here is a headline from The Guardian that speaks volumes as it references the US invasion of Iraq under false pretenses under George W. Bush.

“Trump vies for Bush’s crown for worst foreign policy decision in history”


https://poesieesogni.com/2026/02/28/stop-mr-trump/


Alabama tried this

A retired friend commented on an earlier post “Undocumented immigrants deserve some humanity” by citing his research into the poor treatment of migrant and undocumented immigrants harvesting crops. I mentioned to him an unsuccessful effort by Alabama to restrict employment in harvesting to citizens. Here is an AI search summary on the effort:

“Alabama’s 2011 HB 56 law, which aimed to make life untenable for undocumented immigrants, caused a massive, immediate, and devastating labor shortage in the state’s agricultural sector. Known for strict enforcement, it triggered a ‘self-deportation’ exodus of workers, causing crops to rot and creating intense economic distress for farmers.

Key impacts and details include:


Worker Shortage: Farmers reported that up to 50–60% of their labor force vanished within days of the law’s implementation.


Crop Losses: The lack of labor meant crops like tomatoes, peaches, and cucumbers were not harvested, causing significant financial losses.


“Hard” Labor Shift: Efforts to replace undocumented workers with local citizens largely failed, as farmers reported that U.S.-born laborers were not accustomed to or willing to perform the demanding, labor-intensive work.


Legal Challenges: Following legal challenges, particularly by the Southern Poverty Law Center, many of the most severe provisions of HB 56 were blocked or settled in 2013.


Economic Impact: The law was criticized for potentially costing the state’s economy millions of dollars in lost agricultural revenue.

While some provisions were scaled back, the law’s initial impact in 2011 is frequently cited as a major, albeit chaotic, anti-immigrant action in the U.S.”

I won’t add too much only to say undocumented immigrants have been hired in more than a few industries and in some cases bolster those industries. This was just one failed example. Right now, the hospitality industry was recently reported as suffering as are other industries. A heavy dose of humanity and due process are needed, but so is a lot of planning. Rash, heavy handedness accomplishes little other than notoriety.

Undocumented immigrants deserve some humanity

I wrote the following as a comment on Jill’s blog to rebut a comment that undocumented immigrants deserve no quarter here and should be denied entry and removed forcibly if here.

“Regardless of how one feels about undocumented immigrants, there are three key points that concern me as an Independent and former Republican voter:

-people are owed due process within the borders of our country;

-many undocumented immigrants have been hired by managers and owners of all political persuasions to bolster numerous industries – construction, roofing, landscaping, food processing, restaurant, hospitality, healthcare, crop harvesting, etc. (transition planning would have been helpful);

-people deserve a less heavy handed approach than has been used. To me, it seems we have done a disservice by being harmful as we round up folks.

If the mission is to exit undocumented immigrants, I understand that, but the process could have been far better planned and executed, in my view.”


The one point I will add is this. Managers and owners who hired all of these undocumented immigrants were not necessarily altruistic. The reasons were varied and several. They hired them to fill jobs that others did not want; they hired them because they could pay them in cash with not added benefit costs or FICA taxes; they hired them because if they were injured on the job, they did not have to pay workers compensation; and they hired them because they were as close to slave labor as they could get.

If we did not want undocumented immigrants, then why did elected officials turn a blind eye and let these managers hire them for multiple decades. Let me close with a true story – when a major textile company declared full bankruptcy, federal officials spoke to an auditorium of workers to tell them how they could be helped. They said if you don’t have a Social Security number, we can’t help you. 1/3 of the audience stood up and left.


Top General tries to avoid conflict

The article on CNN called “Balancing act: Top general tries to avoid conflict with Trump while preparing for possible war with Iran” by Natasha Bertrand, Hailey Britzky, and Zachary Cohen
is frightening to me. Here are a few paragraphs:


“As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine has been drafting military options for potentially striking Iran, a steady stream of top officials from the Army, Navy and Air Force have been quietly summoned directly to his office.

Typically, sensitive military operations are debated in the highly fortified conference room in the Pentagon known as the Tank. But in an administration that is focused on avoiding leaks, Caine — who is also known for his intensive secrecy — worried that assembling the top brass in the Defense Department’s nerve center on very short notice would draw suspicion, according to several sources familiar with the matter.


In those meetings and others at the Pentagon, Caine has been vocal about the potential downsides of launching a major military operation targeting Iran, raising concerns about the scale, complexity and potential for US casualties of such a mission, according to sources familiar with his advice.

Those concerns have not matched the rhetoric coming out of the White House, where President Donald Trump has been bullish on how easily the US military could achieve victory, though the exact dimensions of that success haven’t been defined.”

The frightening part beyond military intervention and its risk is we are letting an ego-maniacal and rash person make these decisions. But, if that were not enough, let’s pull a paragraph from General HR McMaster who served in the first Trump White House:

“In his blistering, insightful account of his time in the Trump White House, McMaster describes meetings in the Oval Office as ‘exercises in competitive sycophancy’ during which Trump’s advisers would flatter the president by saying stuff like, ‘Your instincts are always right’ or, ‘No one has ever been treated so badly by the press.’ Meanwhile, Trump would say ‘outlandish’ things like, ‘Why don’t we just bomb the drugs?’ in Mexico or, ‘Why don’t we take out the whole North Korean Army during one of their parades?’”

This is a picture of the US Commander-in-Chief. Let me leave you with a summary by conservative pundit and author David Brooks – paraphrasing, Brooks said the Trump White House is equal parts “chaos and incompetence.” I concur.

108 minutes

What lasts 108 minutes? Here are a few things top of mind:

-the approximate length of a two hour movie on TV, sans commercials,
-the approximate length of back to back TV shows, sans commercials,
-the length of a good scheduled two hour meeting allowing six minutes of travel to and fro,
-the length of an old college basketball game before coaches called every time out they had, and
-the length of time I saved by avoiding listening to the incumbent president wax on with his many untruths, exaggerations, and immaterial boasts.

Let me sum up his speech – I am great, they are not. All his lies build his case to this end. A good example is someone adjudicated multiple times for fraud is setting up a team to investigate fraud. Really? And, JD Vance of “Haitians eating dogs in Ohio” fame will lead it.

A few old series

In the midst of watching two major older series – The Sopranos and Game of Thrones – as we passed on them the first time through, we have been watching a few good series that are lesser known. More on those two at a future time. Here are four series to consider.

Line of Duty – is one of the better police shows we have seen, with multi-faceted plots and a season long guest star who brings gravitas. Its focus is an Anti-Corruption unit that investigates bent cops. The three recurring stars are Adrian Dunbar, Vicky McClure and Martin Compston. Keeley Hawes played a key role of a possible bent cop over two seasons and Thandie Newton does the same over one. The show can be intense leaving you ill-at-ease until the next show. The cops being investigated are quite adroit at their job, so are good at shifting the blame. Often, their mistakes are poor judgement, but sometimes they stretched the envelope to cover something up. The relationship between McClure and Compston is a key to the show.

Spooks – is also good, but its focus is on MI-5. It has a stellar line-up of future stars such as Keeley Hawes, Matthew MacFadyen, David Oyelowo, Peter Firth, Nicola Walker, and Rupert Penry-Jones. The show reveals the emotional toil spy work takes on its agents. MacFadyen and Hawes leave the show in the third season, but it continues on for seven more seasons. These are imperfect people trying to do their jobs and live reasonable lives. The love interests of the agents have to put up with a great deal.


Strong Medicine – is a hospital show focusing on a women’s free clinic run within the umbrella of a non-profit hospital in Philadelphia. It has the heft of Whoopi Goldberg as a co-producer who also appears on occasion. It stars Rosa Blasi as the lead doctor for the clinic, with Janine Turner and eventually Patricia Richardson as the head of the non-profit side of services. Key roles are played by Joshua Coxx as a nurse and mid-wife, Jenifer Lewis as the lead administrative person. The show covers a wide range of issues females face both in child birth or everyday life. Blasi’s relationship with Turner and Richardson are the principal reason for the show, but Coxx and Lewis often steal the scenes. Philip Casnoff and Brennan Elliott play good roles. A favorite part is the opening where a women’s support group speaks with Blasi’s character about relationship or family issues.


Killing Eve – is the bizarre series on the list. It stars Sandra Oh as Eve, an investigator who has picked up on an assassin who works for a secret cabal of the wealthy across Europe. The key story twist is the most colorful assassin, who goes by Villanelle, played by Jodie Comer, has a crush on Eve and vice versa. Fiona Shaw plays Eve’s on and off again boss. Kim Bodnia, with his huge laugh, is Villanelle’s on and off again handler. Comer, though, is the show. She is a psychopath trying to become better, but is a free spirit with a rashness that gets her in trouble. Eve is scared of her, but speaks up when needed.

The last show is unusual, so it may be an acquired taste. We like hospital shows, so we seem to have one or more in our rotation. Line of Duty gets high ratings given its scriptwriting. Tell me what you think if you have seen these.

Following rules and procedures is essential to govern

I wrote a variation of the following as an accent comment to my last post called “No authorization.” I repeat it as I want to emphasize that following rules and procedures is essential in governance.

As an old fart, I have observed when politicians do NOT follow procedures, take it to the bank, it is political. Thanks to Senator Mitch McConnell, we did not interview an excellent SCOTUS nominee as he made up his own rule about not interviewing a nominee in an election year, and we ended up the following year with a lesser quality SCOTUS associate justice. I don’t want politics on SCOTUS – I want competence. It is not like his Senate was too busy to meet with him.

So, Donald Trump’s not following procedures is not unusual nor is it NOT apolitical. What the Republicans in Congress who are scared of Trump have failed to realize, adhering to rules and processes is a way to govern and temper the incumbent president. They could protect themselves from criticism especially from the vindictive incumbent president. Sadly, the Speaker of the House is one of the biggest Trump toadies around, so he is more inclined to grease the skids for Trump than follow rules.

Going back to McConnell, he had a chance to save America from Trump and he failed us. In his second impeachment trial in the Senate (yes the House impeached him twice), the vote to convict Trump was 57 to 43, including seven Republicans. If McConnell had pushed for it, he could have gotten the needed ten more votes to get a 2/3 vote for conviction. He could have told MAGA fans, my hands are tied, Trump is guilty of seditious actions against our country.

As a result, not only did he get reelected, he pardoned over 1,000 insurrectionists who either pled guilty or were found guilty.

No authorization

My friend, who is a retired financial executive, forwarded the following email and New York Times piece. His introduction and the article need no further explanation.

“Not only has Congress not authorized such a war, but it has barely even debated it. The administration has not bothered to explain, either to Congress or the American people, why it might bomb Iran or what it hopes to achieve. ‘There haven’t been any briefings about a military strategy,’ said the Democratic representative Ro Khanna, who is working with his Republican colleague Thomas Massie to force a vote on an antiwar measure.”

Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

I never imagined I’d miss being lied to by George W. Bush and his henchmen.

When the Bush administration wanted to go to war with Iraq, it undertook a full-court press to propagandize the American people. Administration officials leaked false information about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, which turned out not to exist. Secretary of State Colin Powell gave a deceptive presentation at the United Nations. In Congress, many Democrats, succumbing either to relentless public pressure or their own hawkish instincts, joined with Republicans to authorize an invasion.

This mendacious campaign was shameful and despicable, and helped create today’s national atmosphere of corrosive cynicism and nihilistic paranoia. But it was, in retrospect, a tacit acknowledgment that public opinion mattered, that a president couldn’t start a war without convincing Americans it was necessary. It was a manipulation of democratic deliberation rather than a negation of it.

Compare that episode with Donald Trump’s threatened war with Iran. On Wednesday, Axios’s well-sourced reporter Barak Ravid warned, “The Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize. It could begin very soon.” America has undertaken the largest air power buildup in the region since the Iraq war. Outlets including The New York Times have reported that the military has given Trump the option to strike as soon as this weekend.

Not only has Congress not authorized such a war, but it has barely even debated it. The administration has not bothered to explain, either to Congress or the American people, why it might bomb Iran or what it hopes to achieve. “There haven’t been any briefings about a military strategy,” said the Democratic representative Ro Khanna, who is working with his Republican colleague Thomas Massie to force a vote on an antiwar measure.

Most reporting indicates that the White House is planning for a campaign far more intense and sustained than last year’s bombing of Iran or the abduction of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro. But we don’t know if Trump and his team are after regime change, and if they are, what they think comes next. This is how an autocracy goes to war, without even a pretense that the consent of the governed matters.

The Premonition: a Pandemic Story by Michael Lewis is a must read (once again with meaning)

The self-inflicted growing measles outbreak reminds me of what happens when people do not listen to doctors and medical experts. The following is a repost from the time of the COVID outbreak.

************

“You cannot wait for the smoke to clear: once you can see things clearly it is already too late. You can’t outrun an epidemic: by the time you start to run it is already upon you. Identify what is important and drop everything that is not. Figure out the equivalent of an escape fire.”

“James,” she asked, “who exactly is in charge of this pandemic?” “Nobody,” he replied. “But, if you want to know who is sort of in charge, it’s sort of us.” from a conversation between two members of an informal cadre of doctors trying to get to the bottom of things that had no orders to do so from their bosses.

These quotes are from Michael Lewis excellent book on the COVID-19 pandemic called “The Premonition: a Pandemic Story.” Lewis has written another well-researched book breaking down complex topics into a story the reader can understand. He has written about the housing financial crisis in “The Big Short,” baseball’s embracing of data to change the paradigm in “Moneyball,’ how we make decisions in “The Undoing Project,” and how unprepared we were during the Trump presidency in “The Fifth Risk,” among others.

From the inside flap to the book, “For those who could read between the lines, the censored news out of China was terrifying. But, the president insisted there was nothing to worry about. Fortunately, we are still a nation of skeptics. Fortunately, there are those among us who study pandemics and are willing to look unflinchingly at worst case scenarios. Michael Lewis’ taut and brilliant nonfiction thriller pits a band of medical visionaries against the wall of ignorance that was the official response of the Trump administration to the outbreak of COVID-19.”

The book highlights an informal cadre of doctors, data scientists, and epidemiologists who dig deeper into news and data to realize we have an exponentially growing pandemic which is akin to a wildfire. If you do not act early and with strong interventions, it is hard to contain. These folks are acting without permission from their various jobs in governmental health care positions, but share communications regularly even when those communications could get them fired for going against stated public stances.

Several in the group came together at the behest of President George W. Bush after he read a book about the risks of a pandemic to a country like the United States. He formed a pandemic planning team that pulled together resources who had a reputation for solving problems in health care, breaking down preconceived notions. And, they wrote a pandemic response plan after doing much research about the failures and successes in fighting the Spanish Flu outbreak. They actually used data to turn that story on its ear.

While a few stayed around in the administration during the Obama years and were of benefit during other pandemics, they were long gone during the Trump administration who felt the greater risk was from a military or terrorist action. So, they went back to their health care related jobs. That was until they started to see reports out of China and dug deeper.

They saw global exposure and used previous exponential pandemic growth to ascertain that we could be looking at 350,000 US deaths. The key is they made this observation in mid-January, 2020. What they learned later is the exponential growth factor from COVID-19 was higher than that of other diseases. Carter Mecher, the informal head of this group who called themselves “The Wolverines” after a Patrick Swayze movie called “Red Dawn,” noted by the time the president closed incoming travel from China, it was too late as the pandemic had already reached our shores. By the time the US had its first reported death on February 26, it was masking the fact 200 others were already dying.

Acting quickly without all of the data is key as per the quote above. A key data driven lesson from the Spanish Flu response is social distancing, especially with children, is essential. The first thing they would have done is shut the schools down. Why? Kids average a distance apart of only three feet, while adults have wider distance. Kids will transmit any disease faster than adults. This practice was done in some cities during the Spanish Flu outbreak and the data showed it worked, whereas other cities who did not act like this, had worse pandemic responses.

This cadre started getting attention of others beneath the president and in governor’s offices, including Dr. Tony Fauci. So, their informal calls and email chains kept growing. They were the only folks who seemed to know what they were talking about. We also learned the CDC is not the best agency to manage a pandemic, as it is more of a research and report writing entity, not a nimble management group. One of the members of the informal team worked for the CDC and her bosses did not know she did, e.g. Yet, the CDC and White House administration staff would not go against the public positions of the president. Perception mattered more than fixing the problem, so needed change and actions could not get done. In fact, some of these officials encouraged them to keep going, even though they knew the president was not the kind of person who they could contradict without repercussions.

So, at a time when we needed to move quickly, people in positions of authority stood in the way of those who were begging with them to act quickly. A good example is in a public health official named Charity Dean in California, who was used to acting quickly when she saw potential outbreaks, often risking her job in so doing. Her boss came from the CDC and was towing that party line, yet Dean had been drafted into this informal group “The Wolverines.” While her boss disinvited her from internal pandemic meetings, she kept learning and sharing information with the group. Eventually, her boss could not make a press conference with Governor Newsom, and Dean spoke for 45 minutes of her concerns answering many questions. The press said this is the first time they have heard this. The governor acted quickly.

The book is a must read, in my view. It shows how important leadership is in welcoming information from reliable sources to make their decisions. It also shows how important courage is to tell leaders what they need to hear, not what they want to hear. As I read this book, I kept thinking how the former president craves being seen as a good leader, but at the time when we needed him to be one, he whiffed at the ball on the tee. A key to pandemic responses is to tell people the truth – only then will they act. When the so-called leader is telling them it will all go away soon on the same day the first US death is reported or that this is a Democrat hoax, then people hear that and act accordingly. The problem is those statements were far from the truth.

A quick conversation on diversity

I am headed out the door, but here is a quick conversation between our friend Jill and me.

Jill commented: “I read yesterday that federal agencies have been ordered by Trump to ensure that contractors and others they do business with have no history of DEI or any programs that support anti-discrimination! And the Department of Education now has a website for the public to report anything remotely resembling DEI in schools! Jim Crow has been reincarnated by this fascist, racist regime.”

I responded: “Quite simply, diversity is strength of America. If we let regressive, narrow-minded elected officials like Trump squelch access to talent, experience and ideas, we will hasten our decline.”

Ideas are precious. They come from all over and from all kinds of people. Often, those closest to the customer or production may have elegant ideas to improve things. If we limit idea creation, then we are only shooting ourselves in the foot.